Why fiction writers should learn mathematics, from the New Yorker

Here is a lovely article, by Alexander Narayan, connecting the worlds of mathematics and literature.

“I am interested in mathematics only as a creative art,” Hardy, the Cambridge mathematician, wrote. He meant creative in the most literal sense, contrasting serious mathematical inquiry with chess. The latter, too, requires great intelligence, but it resolves nothing of the human condition. The same distinction exists in fiction, between the diverting and the serious, the trivial and the universal. In both cases, too, formulas are but guideposts that fall away the higher you climb. In the end, you are left alone with your own variables, your own private equations.

About manyapajama

Associate Professor in Mathematics Education, and part-time poet.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment